Christian wrote:
> On Fr, 18 Mai 2018, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
> > Oh, but that is long ago. Why didn't anybody complain that this didn't
> > work? Everybody using the github version would have run into this
> > problem.
> >
> > I wonder if there are any other changes that got rolled back.
>
> When you rolled back netrw, Vim was already at version 8.0.1390, so that
> check
> ,----
> | if v:version < 704 || !has("patch213")
> `----
>
> still returned true. However with Release 8.1, the check for patch 213
> did start failing again.
Ah, of course, patch213 existed in 8.0 by then, and nobody noticed the
check was actually wrong. I should not try to figure this out late at
night...
We should not have that kind of check, since it leads to problems like
this. I'll update the help for it.
--
A disclaimer for the disclaimer:
"and before I get a huge amount of complaints , I have no control over the
disclaimer at the end of this mail :-)" (Timothy Aldrich)
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
