> On Wednesday, April 17, 2019 at 5:46:35 PM UTC+2, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> > That would be useful information for your initial version ;)
>
> I'm sorry for not mentioning version earlier. About that one line, I did
>
> >
> > Can you show a simple test case? So we can fix it and make sure it
> > doesn't regress anymore? Thanks.
>
> 1) $ vim -p file1 file2
>
> 2) then in vim type ':f' or just initial bottom status message suffices.
>
> 3) switch to other tab
>
> Actual results:
> Message stays there.
>
> Expected results:
> Clean status line.
That is not the status line, that is the command line, which is also
used for messages. Not clearing that is intentional. Since you used
":file" the info is outdated, but it could be the output of any command.
--
>From "know your smileys":
(\___/)
(+'.'+) Bunny
(")_(")
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
