On 2009-03-28 21:21 (-0400), Matt Wozniski wrote: > On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 3:55 PM, James Freer wrote: >> Couldn't agree more jeff > > Regardless of your personal feelings, it is a list policy.
On 2009-03-29 14:38 (+1100), John Beckett wrote: > For the non-believers, Matt is correct: > http://groups.google.com/group/vim_use/web/vim-information I have to say that from the 50 (or so) mailing lists or newsgroups that I read regularly this list is the most unreadable one. I'm not sure why people on other lists tend to write more readable messages and have more time to trim their quotations. They just somehow understand that they get more readers when they spend a little more time editing their messages to be easy-to-read for a wider audience. But thank you for having patience to point people to the policy. I'm too lazy for that and I just skip the messages that are difficult and too slow to figure out. A couple of times I have "killfiled" an author because of continuously writing waste-of-time messages (that is, from my point of view). I don't mean to offend anybody; I just choose what to do with my time. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
