On Jun 12, 1:45 am, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Christian used :command in his examples, not :cabbr, so I think this
> will not be a problem.
>
Yes, in the simple case of doing the right thing for an
accidental :Wq, :W, or :E, a command actually has advantages over an
abbreviation. But you can't correct mistakes such as :wq!
@, :wq1, :qa~, etc. using a :command.
I didn't claim my method was better, I just wanted to demonstrate a
second option (with its own advantages and disadvantages).
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
