Huhuhahahaha ! GREAT!
We only have to think about the command code for that ;))) Charles Campbell <[email protected]> [09-06-12 17:39]: > > Ben Fritz wrote: > > > > On Jun 12, 1:45 am, "[email protected]" > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Christian used :command in his examples, not :cabbr, so I think this > >> will not be a problem. > >> > >> > > > > Yes, in the simple case of doing the right thing for an > > accidental :Wq, :W, or :E, a command actually has advantages over an > > abbreviation. But you can't correct mistakes such as :wq! > > @, :wq1, :qa~, etc. using a :command. > > > > I didn't claim my method was better, I just wanted to demonstrate a > > second option (with its own advantages and disadvantages). > > > Yep -- Bram's got to start working on the VimMindReader -- so that vim > will do what I want, not what I type! :) > > Regards, > Chip Campbell > > > -- Please don't send me any Word- or Powerpoint-Attachments unless it's absolutely neccessary. - Send simply Text. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html In a world without fences and walls nobody needs gates and windows. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/vim_use?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
