Ben Fritz wrote: > > On Jun 12, 1:45 am, "[email protected]" > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Christian used :command in his examples, not :cabbr, so I think this >> will not be a problem. >> >> > > Yes, in the simple case of doing the right thing for an > accidental :Wq, :W, or :E, a command actually has advantages over an > abbreviation. But you can't correct mistakes such as :wq! > @, :wq1, :qa~, etc. using a :command. > > I didn't claim my method was better, I just wanted to demonstrate a > second option (with its own advantages and disadvantages). > Yep -- Bram's got to start working on the VimMindReader -- so that vim will do what I want, not what I type! :)
Regards, Chip Campbell --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
