Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado wrote: >> hmm.. esperantista? > > Trying to ;)
Interesting in this day and age, with the English language having become the de facto "lingua franca". :-) [..] >>> My policy, which may be utterly wrong, is to put them in my ~/.vimrc [..] > The problem is that it doesn't scale well. If you write a lot of > *generic* functions, not applicable to any particular filetype, your > best bet is probably to put them in autoload plugins or something along > these lines. I looked at that, but it didn't look like something you can just jump into. >> I guess one-liners could go into one's .vimrc, but anything much >> bigger like 20-30 lines chunks would soon become unmanageable. > > Yes, that's another point. My functions (the generic ones, at least) are > pretty short, maybe 10 lines maximum, so they don't clutter my ~/.vimrc, > but if you have maybe 10 functions with let's say... 25 lines each, > that's *a lot* of clutter. In that case, although the number of > functions is pretty low, I would put them in separate files and I would > source them (or use the autoload plugin solution, which looks a bit > overkill to me, but then again I haven't had startup speed problems with > Vim yet). Sounds like the easiest would be to create a ~/.vim/functions and sourcing that. [/OT] >> P.S. [OT] What mailer do you use? Your signature comes out a different >> color, not that I mind.. just curious how it's done your end. > > My mailer is GMail directly. Thought it might be - didn't see any "User-agent" mentioned in your message headers - and the reason I asked is that I have seen quite a few people on different mailing lists who use gmail as an excuse to format their posts in a way that doesn't abide by the lists' policies. So it looks like you can also abuse lowly gmail. > I edit my email with Vim using a Firefox > extension because I can't stand the GMail builtin editor (it is > rich-text or whatever) or the Firefox editor for textboxes (which is way > too simple). So, my email should be in plain text, with no coloring set > up in my side. Hmm.. wonder if the extension would work with seamonkey-mail, ~= T-Bird. > But, whenever I edit email with Vim (this one, for example), my > signature appears in a different color because the syntax highlighting, > and some MUAs (mutt, Claws if I recall correctly, maybe others) color > signatures differently if they detect the magic "-- " at the start of a > line. That's what prompted me to investigate: I couldn't remember having set any highlighting for signatures, doubled checked and still I don't see anything. It actually "disappears" when composing a reply.. I'm looking at the bottom of this message and it's gone. So what if I found your signature more interesting than your post and wanted to comment on it..?? ;-) [OT/] Now that I have run out, I'll wait for Xmas and see if Santa brings me a few "OT" credits for the coming year. Gen-Paul. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
