On 2009-11-09, James Michael Fultz wrote: > * Gary Johnson <[email protected]> [2009-11-09 17:13 -0800]:
> > The problem is that the latest official release of vim is 7.2 with > > no patches. It is up to anyone building a patched version to > > download and apply the patches themselves. The patches, however, do > > not include any updates to the runtime files, so one has to also > > download and install the latest runtime files. That apparently > > wasn't done by the folks distributing the vim packages that you and > > I have. That, or the new indent/sh.vim didn't make it into the > > runtime repository. > > Would this be a packaging bug? It's a bug somewhere. If, as you say below, the runtime repository doesn't contain the version of a plugin that matches the latest documentation, then there will be an error in the package but it won't be the fault of the packager. > > I've been lax in keeping the vim installations I build myself up to > > date, so I don't know whether the runtime repository currently has > > the new indent/sh.vim or not. > > OK, seems the new 'indent/sh.vim' isn't in the runtime repository. It > is the same revision I already had installed -- 2006-04-19. > > > There is definitely an error in the current help documentation as > > well, but I don't know whether the correct name for the dictionary > > is sh_indent_defaults or sh_indent_options. > > Should I file a bug report on it? I think you should file reports on both bugs. > Thanks for your help. You're welcome. Regards, Gary --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
