On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Gary Johnson wrote: > > On 2009-11-09, James Michael Fultz wrote: >> * Gary Johnson <[email protected]> [2009-11-09 17:13 -0800]: > >> > The problem is that the latest official release of vim is 7.2 with >> > no patches. It is up to anyone building a patched version to >> > download and apply the patches themselves. The patches, however, do >> > not include any updates to the runtime files, so one has to also >> > download and install the latest runtime files. That apparently >> > wasn't done by the folks distributing the vim packages that you and >> > I have. That, or the new indent/sh.vim didn't make it into the >> > runtime repository. >> >> Would this be a packaging bug? > > It's a bug somewhere. If, as you say below, the runtime repository > doesn't contain the version of a plugin that matches the latest > documentation, then there will be an error in the package but it > won't be the fault of the packager.
It's an upstream problem, for sure. ftp://ftp.vim.org/ftp/pub/vim/runtime/doc/indent.txt mentions sh_indent_options and sh_indent defaults ftp://ftp.vim.org/ftp/pub/vim/runtime/indent/sh.vim uses neither. Since those are the latest runtime files from FTP in both cases, the docs definitely don't match up with the indent script. ~Matt --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
