On 11/11/09 00:49, Matt Wozniski wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Gary Johnson wrote: >> >> On 2009-11-09, James Michael Fultz wrote: >>> * Gary Johnson<[email protected]> [2009-11-09 17:13 -0800]: >> >>>> The problem is that the latest official release of vim is 7.2 with >>>> no patches. It is up to anyone building a patched version to >>>> download and apply the patches themselves. The patches, however, do >>>> not include any updates to the runtime files, so one has to also >>>> download and install the latest runtime files. That apparently >>>> wasn't done by the folks distributing the vim packages that you and >>>> I have. That, or the new indent/sh.vim didn't make it into the >>>> runtime repository. >>> >>> Would this be a packaging bug? >> >> It's a bug somewhere. If, as you say below, the runtime repository >> doesn't contain the version of a plugin that matches the latest >> documentation, then there will be an error in the package but it >> won't be the fault of the packager. > > It's an upstream problem, for sure. > > ftp://ftp.vim.org/ftp/pub/vim/runtime/doc/indent.txt mentions > sh_indent_options and sh_indent defaults > > ftp://ftp.vim.org/ftp/pub/vim/runtime/indent/sh.vim uses neither. > > Since those are the latest runtime files from FTP in both cases, the > docs definitely don't match up with the indent script. > > ~Matt
I notice that the current indent/sh.vim (which uses that Dictionary) is dated 2009-11-12, i.e., three days after you posted this. So either the change was "in the queue for the next update" when you posted this, or you triggered the fix. Best regards, Tony. -- Don't abandon hope: your Tom Mix decoder ring arrives tomorrow. -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
