Chris Jones wrote: > I tried it with a fairly large tree called ~/tarballs and it took over a > minute, with Vim flying at 100% CPU. There was a message to the effect > that it was indexing/caching the nodes or something. Now the weird thing > is that in another test, my home directory, which contains the tarballs > tree only took 3-4 seconds - go figure. > > Actually I did the same test again with another instance of Vim, > naturally, in order to take a closer look at the message, same tarballs > directory and this time it only took about two seconds. > > So it looks as if there are glitches when it takes forever, and normal > circumstances where it takes somwhere between 3-5 seconds to load a > directory, why is too slow to my taste. > > I'll try to run tests again when I have more time. > Would you try this with netrw? Since you seem to like tree mode, put
let g:netrw_liststyle= 3 in your .vimrc. In a directory of mine with 245 files: (and loading all my usual plugins, etc) time gvim . -c "q" real 0m0.22s user 0m0.17s sys 0m0.02s Regards, Chip Campbell -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
