At 10:58 -0500 on 27/08/02, Donn Haven Lathrop wrote:

>>>Nahh the drives do look bare, Apple didn't do dust protection in
>1989, hence why the drives pack up in the first place.<<
>
>Odd.  When I had my SE updated to 4 MB memory, the techs stuck in the
>shell, and said that Apple insisted.  The drive didn't pack up for a
>long time.

I find those little plastic shells to be a lot WORSE at holding dust in than
the drives without the shell.  Invariably, the drives with shells I get in
older Macs have more dust in them than drives without shells.
-- 

the pickle

FAQ <http://macfaq.org/index.shtml>

Software Archive
<ftp://download:[EMAIL PROTECTED]//Users/thepickl/Sites/Archive/>
<http://www.members.jmug.org/%7Ethepickl/archive/>
_________________________________________________________________

-- 
Vintage Macs is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...

 Small Dog Electronics    http://www.smalldog.com   | Enter To Win A |
 -- Canon PowerShot Digital Cameras start at $299   |  Free iBook!   |

      Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>

Vintage Macs list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/vintagemacs.shtml>
The FAQ:                <http://macfaq.org/>
Send list messages to:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, email:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/vintage.macs%40mail.maclaunch.com/>

Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com

Reply via email to