--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quoting Gregg Eshelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 
> > 
> > What if it's a new printer without 68k drivers and
> > doesn't have LaserWriter emulation? (Or emulation
> > for any other PostScript printer brand that had
> 68k drivers?)
> 
> Every 68k Mac can print to any postscript
> laserprinter (emulated postscript 
> and real postscript) that talks appletalk (these
> specs involve about every 
> networkable postscript laserprinter in existence).

Depends on how well the PostScript is emulated. :P
I had a Qume CrystalPrint Publisher II that would
work, barely, when it felt like it with the
LaserWriter
drivers compatable with Mac OS 7.6.1 on my Power IIci.
With olde enough drivers and System 7.1 it worked
fine. 

Supposedly the Qume was able to emulate the
LaserWriter
II NTR. With the newer drivers the best they would
allow was generic LaserWriter. Same thing using it
with Windows 9x. I was stuck with generic LaserWriter
or generic LaserJet when the printer supposedly
would pretend to be a LaserJet II. (With Win3.1x it
could.) Apparently Adobe made Apple and Mcrosoft
"tighten up" the drivers they provided to almost
exclude printers running "clonescript" emulations
of PostScript instead of licensing real PostScript
from Adobe. (I thought about trying the 3.1x drivers
with 98SE but decided to junk the printer instead.)

NEC is another company who's used a "clonescript"
in some of their printers to avoid paying a license
fee to Adobe.

So if you're looking for a PostScript printer, make
sure it says it has genuine Adobe PostScript.
Otherwise
Adobe can jigger the drivers (or insist Apple and
Microsoft do it) at any update to eliminate
compatability or cut it down to the most basic modes
of functionality. Then you're stuck either keeping
an old computer, old OS and old drivers just to
support a printer.

A related note on forced obsolescence, I _had_ my
UMAX scanner working with WinXP even though it
supposedly wasn't supported. ;) Apparently UMAX got
together with MS because after applying SP1 the
scanner just wouldn't work anymore. :( Well, that
gives me a great scanner for use on my Macs! Only
the Mac software version that originally shipped
with the Vista S6-E will work, but at least it
works up through OS 9.1. Why forcibly "obsolete" the
scanner for WinXP but not MacOS 9.x.x???

=====
"Work it harder make it better do it faster makes us stronger.
More than ever hour after our work is never over." Daft Punk

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now
http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/

-- 
Vintage Macs is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...

 Small Dog Electronics    http://www.smalldog.com   | Enter To Win A |
 -- Canon PowerShot Digital Cameras start at $299   |  Free iBook!   |

      Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>

Vintage Macs list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/vintagemacs.shtml>
The FAQ:                <http://macfaq.org/>
Send list messages to:  <mailto:vintage.macs@;mail.maclaunch.com>
To unsubscribe, email:  <mailto:vintage.macs-off@;mail.maclaunch.com>
For digest mode, email: <mailto:vintage.macs-digest@;mail.maclaunch.com>
Subscription questions: <mailto:listmom@;lowendmac.com>
Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/vintage.macs%40mail.maclaunch.com/>

Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com

Reply via email to