All, I wanted to share this before the holidays but didn't get a chance. Libvirt engineering forwarded some really positive testing news. The noted FAIL/SKIP's all have fixes being worked on, but the best news (IMHO) is the last part: He found a non-released libvirt regression bug!
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Interesting/really good - virt-test results Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 07:01:34 -0500 From: John Ferlan <[email protected]> Just thought I'd share results from a run last night... Still using f19, running against recent upstream libvirt sources. ./run -t libvirt --keep-image-between-tests --tests virsh --no "virsh.find_storage_pool_sources_as,virsh.update_device,virsh.vol_create_from" --install --remove TESTS: 2184 ... TOTAL TIME: 44194.44 s (12:16:34) TESTS PASSED: 1918 TESTS FAILED: 2 TESTS SKIPPED: 264 SUCCESS RATE: 99.90 % ...cut... I also have 1 fix to a regression added to libvirt in the (non released) top of tree (bug will cause snapshot_edit to crash libvirtd because the 'new' panic device wasn't found - I have a patch pending). This regression was found by virt-test - which is good. _______________________________________________ Virt-test-devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-test-devel
