On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 10:33:06 -0500 Chris Evich <[email protected]> wrote:
> All, > > I wanted to share this before the holidays but didn't get a chance. > Libvirt engineering forwarded some really positive testing news. The > noted FAIL/SKIP's all have fixes being worked on, but the best news > (IMHO) is the last part: He found a non-released libvirt regression > bug! Excellent Chris! These tests were run on upstream libvirt or distro shipped libvirt? --Pradeep > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Interesting/really good - virt-test results > Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 07:01:34 -0500 > From: John Ferlan <[email protected]> > Just thought I'd share results from a run last night... Still using > f19, running against recent upstream libvirt sources. > > ./run -t libvirt --keep-image-between-tests --tests virsh --no > "virsh.find_storage_pool_sources_as,virsh.update_device,virsh.vol_create_from" > --install --remove > > TESTS: 2184 > ... > TOTAL TIME: 44194.44 s (12:16:34) > TESTS PASSED: 1918 > TESTS FAILED: 2 > TESTS SKIPPED: 264 > SUCCESS RATE: 99.90 % > > ...cut... > > I also have 1 fix to a regression added to libvirt in the (non > released) top of tree (bug will cause snapshot_edit to crash libvirtd > because the 'new' panic device wasn't found - I have a patch > pending). This regression was found by virt-test - which is good. > > _______________________________________________ > Virt-test-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-test-devel > _______________________________________________ Virt-test-devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-test-devel
