On Fri, Jan 14 2022, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email protected]> wrote:

> It is unfortunate that it does not copy this requirement in more places,
> and that the non-conformance text is incomplete and does not
> mention the MSI-X usage at all.
>
> I propose to extend 4.1.4.5 ISR status capability and 
> 4.1.5.4 Notification of Device Configuration Changes
> to mention the MSI use.

I agree that it would make sense to be more explicit, especially if
people have already fallen into this trap.

My main question is: do we still have time to do this for 1.2? By the
proposed timeline, we need to have a vote open by Jan 17th (next
Monday), which is cutting it awfully close.

[We seem to have quite some last minute stuff, sigh.]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to