On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 05:33:58PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Fri, Jan 14 2022, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > It is unfortunate that it does not copy this requirement in more places, > > and that the non-conformance text is incomplete and does not > > mention the MSI-X usage at all. > > > > I propose to extend 4.1.4.5 ISR status capability and > > 4.1.5.4 Notification of Device Configuration Changes > > to mention the MSI use. > > I agree that it would make sense to be more explicit, especially if > people have already fallen into this trap. > > My main question is: do we still have time to do this for 1.2? By the > proposed timeline, we need to have a vote open by Jan 17th (next > Monday), which is cutting it awfully close. > > [We seem to have quite some last minute stuff, sigh.]
I think the main thing is not to have regressions. This is hardly one, it's been like this for years. So if no vote by Monday we just defer. -- MST --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
