2009/11/22 DRC <dcomman...@users.sourceforge.net>: > OK, so perhaps I should have said it doesn't have "full 3D > acceleration", but the result is the same. Most built-in Linux drivers > are "2.5D" accelerated at best. > > Let me put this another way-- the 3D driver must support Pbuffer-enabled > FB configs in order to work in a VirtualGL server. NVIDIA and ATI > boards using the respective drivers from those vendors are the only > configurations that are known to support Pbuffer-enabled FB configs. > Thus, these boards are the only ones known to work in a VirtualGL > server. If you discover another configuration that works, let us know > about it, and I'll be glad to update the docs to reflect this. > > Most likely, Mesa is reporting that GLX_SGIX_pbuffer is available, but > it isn't actually implemented in the underlying driver. I've seen that > before.
OK, understood. I will perform the definite test with my ATI powered machine and both fglrx and radeon drivers. I guess I'll file a bug in the appropriate place if indeed fglrx works while radeon doesn't. Regards Jose ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ VirtualGL-Users mailing list VirtualGL-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtualgl-users
