For the record, these people seem to be doing fine with Intel cards and VirtualGL:
http://trac.nchc.org.tw/grid/wiki/VirtualGL_UsageNote 2009/11/22 Jose Rodriguez <josec.rodrig...@gmail.com>: > 2009/11/22 DRC <dcomman...@users.sourceforge.net>: >> OK, so perhaps I should have said it doesn't have "full 3D >> acceleration", but the result is the same. Most built-in Linux drivers >> are "2.5D" accelerated at best. >> >> Let me put this another way-- the 3D driver must support Pbuffer-enabled >> FB configs in order to work in a VirtualGL server. NVIDIA and ATI >> boards using the respective drivers from those vendors are the only >> configurations that are known to support Pbuffer-enabled FB configs. >> Thus, these boards are the only ones known to work in a VirtualGL >> server. If you discover another configuration that works, let us know >> about it, and I'll be glad to update the docs to reflect this. >> >> Most likely, Mesa is reporting that GLX_SGIX_pbuffer is available, but >> it isn't actually implemented in the underlying driver. I've seen that >> before. > > OK, understood. I will perform the definite test with my ATI powered > machine and both fglrx and radeon drivers. I guess I'll file a bug in > the appropriate place if indeed fglrx works while radeon doesn't. > > Regards > > Jose > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ VirtualGL-Users mailing list VirtualGL-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtualgl-users
