I've gotten some activity on ati.cchtml.com and they are pointing at consumer hardware being useless at glReadPixels() and that I should get a workstation card.
Those things aren't exactly cheap though, so I was hoping someone here with a workstation card could do a test and see if it solves the performance issue. Darrell, perhaps you can dig out that V5700? Secondly, the 9.9 driver works somewhat well here, but the 9.12 doesn't. This difference is not reflected in the glreadtest numbers. Is there some other test that might pinpoint why 9.9 is working better with VirtualGL? Rgds -- Pierre Ossman OpenSource-based Thin Client Technology System Developer Telephone: +46-13-21 46 00 Cendio AB Web: http://www.cendio.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________ VirtualGL-Users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtualgl-users
