Hi, Francesco Peeters (Asterisk): > on the protocol state, insisting to keep the D-channel up, instead of only > activating it when necessary)
Note that it was written mainly for PBXes. Their ISDN is configured as
P2P, not P2MP, and one of the differences is that the D channel stays up.
Always.
> As long as ZapHFC keeps choking on the channels, and vISDN doesn't do
> (inband?) DTMF from the ISDN phones connected to it, neither one is a
> reliable option for me right now. My money is on vISDN however, as it
> seems to be maturing much faster! ;-)
>
Seconded. All of it, unfortunately...
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disclaimer: The quote was selected randomly. Really. | http://smurf.noris.de
- -
Well, that's more-or-less what I was saying, though obviously addition
is a little more cosmic than the bitwise operators.
-- Larry Wall in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Visdn-hackers mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.uli.it/mailman/listinfo/visdn-hackers
