Dan Wing <[email protected]> wrote: > > How can we best handle both in-person and remote attendees? Remote > attendees get frustrated with speakers/chairs using visual queues or > pointing at slides,
There are many whiteboard facilities within conferencing software which can reduce those problems. But the learning curve for them is substantial enough that most folks haven't learned to use them. :^( In which case, the remote participant needs to speak up! > while in-person attendees are frustrated with remote speakers that > don't pause when the entire room is confused by their presentation > (and cannot see the frowning). Though the exact details aren't fully clear, we certainly could imagine a video feed to the remote participant _showing_ the confusion. > In my company, for some meetings, we have switched to have 100% in-person > attendees or 100% remote attendees, which seems to resolve several of the > issues. I wouldn't want to retreat that far. We can't seem to get all the players to physically attend IETF weeks. Furthermore, IMHO, all-remote meetings become exhausting after about 45 minutes. -- John Leslie <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html. https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet
