Hi Alia,

There’s a draft that will be updated soon with some experiences and 
recommendations.  

Some comments inline:

> I am curious about how the various IETF Hubs have been doing?
> What activities have you tried and found useful/successful/interesting?

Hubs in Latin America have been diverse:
        Some hubs were just a small gathering for remote WG session 
participation only.
        Some hubs were meetings with an introduction/presentation and then the 
WG session (sometimes with local explanations and discussions in parallel) 
        Some had a previous introduction webinar to prepare participants 
        Some hubs were organized for IETF promotion and the WG session itself 
was less important (more local activities)
        Sometimes (in Brazil) they were organized as remote "IETF meetings” 
were the students had a WG to attend in each slot.
        Some hubs were co-located with other events (academia) were a meeting 
room had the remote WG session

> What did you try that failed miserably?

In some cases the hubs had as few as three or four participants… but I would 
not consider it a failure. 
There were hubs that failed because remote participation was impossible (low 
quality) and they did something else. 

> Do you have a community organizer (or group of folks) pushing the organization
> of the activities and facilitating?

Yes… there’s always an organizer / facilitator

>   Do you have different people stepping up to pull things together?  

Yes… I’m including Juliao Braga from Brasil who is the main one in our region.

> 
> What is your participation like?  Is it largely experienced IETFers?  
> researchers & students? interested developers?

We’ve been using them for IETF engagement so they’re usually not experienced 
IETFers, mostly students and professors, some network operators. I’m not aware 
of developers but some students can count as such. 

> 
> Personally, I'm brainstorming a bit about what might be useful to try in the 
> Boston Hub and how much to push or encourage structure.  It feels like some 
> can be quite useful.

Please don’t consider our experiences as “best practice”. We do have completely 
different needs and objectives for remote hubs in our region. 

Christian

> 
> Thanks,
> Alia
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html.
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html.
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet

Reply via email to