|
We were offered by an IBM Business Partner to have a performance study
conducted, but when they found we run the zOS under zVM they informed us that
IBM stated the tools would not work.
Here is a copy of what was sent to the business partner by IBM: No, zOSPROD1 will not know about either
zOSTEST or zOSPROD2. Not only that, but RMF will not really know how much CPU
it (itself) is using, nor will it have any idea what the real configuration of
the machine is. I'm looking for the (now ancient) article explaining why you
shouldn't trust MVS performance data when it's running as a guest, but so far I
haven't found it. This seems to indicate that if we would move our zOS to it’s own LPAR
that we could get better performance out of the zOS system. QUESTION:
How much better would the zOS perform in it’s own LPAR? Currently we seem to be CPU
constrained. Can we still share the zOS DASD back to zVM in READ mode on zVM? Note: The reason we run zOS under zVM is because in the old days we only
had parallel channels and we would have needed a CTC box to connect the two
LPARS. But now with a z800 and
escon all I need is a cable. (Correct?) Thanks in advance. William L. Boyer Senior
IT Consultant / Senior Systems Programmer Business
and Technology Services
|
- Performance of zOS guest. William Boyer
- Re: Performance of zOS guest. Gregg Reed
- Performance of zOS guest. Bill Bitner
- Re: Performance of zOS guest. Jim Bohnsack
- Re: Performance of zOS guest. Pohlen Mailinglist
- Re: Performance of zOS guest. Bill Bitner
- Re: Performance of zOS guest. Anne & Lynn Wheeler
- Re: Performance of zOS guest. William Boyer
- Re: Performance of zOS guest. Pohlen Mailinglist
- Re: Performance of zOS guest. Eginhard Jaeger
- Re: Performance of zOS guest. Bill Bitner
