Bill
We would have all been disappointed if we had not heard an "it depends"
answer from you, but the real treat is "it really depends".
Jim
At 04:03 PM 10/13/2005, you wrote:
William Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
It really depends on the tools and which SMF records are used as to
the accuracy of the information.
>
>QUESTION: How much better would the zOS perform in it's own LPAR? =
>Currently we seem to be CPU constrained.
>Can we still share the zOS DASD back to zVM in READ mode on zVM?
It depends. If you look at the performance data from VM, most tools
report a total cpu for the guest and virtual cpu time (there are
places that virtual is called emulation tim). The difference between
the two values is CP time. A safe approximation is that when run in
an LPAR without VM, you'll save the CP time.
Bill Bitner - VM Performance Evaluation - IBM Endicott - 607-429-3286
Jim Bohnsack
Cornell Univ.
(607) 255-1760
