Okay...then the next step is:
"Go to your network guy and ask him to draw you a picture of what the network looks like. If (my understanding of) your understanding of the network matches his
picture, then you may have to call it in and get some traces for us to look at."
Regards,
Miguel Diaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
VM/ESA and z/VM Discussions <[email protected]> wrote on 10/14/2005 04:02:32 PM:
> I don't know anymore<G>.
>
> My IP address is 192.168.193.3.
> But the Gateway (for supernet purposes) is 192.168.192
> So I don't know if my default route is
> 192.168.192.1 or
> 192.168.193.1.
>
> But in either case, neither works:
>
> ping 192.168.192.1
> Ping Level 510: Pinging host 192.168.192.1.
> Enter 'HX' followed by 'BEGIN' to interrupt.
> ping 192.168.193.1
> PING: Ping #1 timed out
> Ready(00004); T=0.01/0.01 14:59:07
> Ping Level 510: Pinging host 192.168.193.1.
> Enter 'HX' followed by 'BEGIN' to interrupt.
> PING: Ping #1 timed out
> Ready(00004); T=0.01/0.01 14:59:17
> netstat home
> VM TCP/IP Netstat Level 510
>
> IPv4 Home address entries:
>
> Address Link
> ------- ------
> 192.168.193.3 QDIO0
>
> IPv6 Home address entries: None
> netstat gate
>
> VM TCP/IP Netstat Level 510
>
>
>
> Known IPv4 gateways:
>
>
>
> NetAddress FirstHop Flgs PktSz Subnet Mask Subnet Value
> Link
> ---------- -------- ---- ----- ----------- ------------
> ------
> Default 192.168.192.1 UGS 1500 <none>
> QDIO0
> 192.168.192.0 <direct> US 1500 0.0.3.0 0.0.0.0
> QDIO0
>
>
> Known IPv6 gateways: None
>
>
>
> Tom Duerbusch
> THD Consulting
>
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/14/05 2:56 PM >>>
> > VM TCP/IP Netstat Level 510
> >
> > Known IPv4 gateways:
> > NetAddress FirstHop Flgs PktSz Subnet Mask Subnet Value
>
> Link
> > ---------- -------- ---- ----- ----------- ------------
>
> ------
> > Default 192.168.192.1 UGS 1500 <none> QDIO0
> > 192.168.192.0 <direct> US 1500 0.0.3.0 0.0.0.0
> QDIO0
>
>
> > 192.168.193.1 (default) no ping
> > 205.235.227.74 (the VM system on the IFL) no ping
>
> Which is your default, 192.168.193.1 or 192.168.192.1? (you said the
> former, but configured the latter)
>
> Regards,
> Miguel Diaz
> z/VM TCP/IP Development
- Re: Subnet mask problem Tom Duerbusch
- Re: Subnet mask problem Miguel Diaz
- Re: Subnet mask problem Alan Altmark
- Re: Subnet mask problem Tom Duerbusch
- Re: Subnet mask problem Adam Thornton
- Re: Subnet mask problem Miguel Diaz
- Re: Subnet mask problem Tom Duerbusch
- Re: Subnet mask problem Jack Woehr
- Re: Subnet mask problem Miguel Diaz
- Re: Subnet mask problem Tom Duerbusch
- Re: Subnet mask problem Miguel Diaz
- Re: Subnet mask problem Tom Duerbusch
