Does anyone really still channel attach printers to VM systems??  I
thought MVS stole them all a long time ago!

Marcy Cortes

This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information.  If
you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on
this message or any information herein.  If you have received this
message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail
and delete this message.  Thank you for your cooperation."

-----Original Message-----
From: VM/ESA and z/VM Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Boyes
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 11:00
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [VMESA-L] Unified printing...

 
> "...everyone has it..."
> 
> Yeah, but... 
> 
> It is my eventual goal to get my RSCS configuration down to 
> LPR-only printers, (I have a few SNA connected remote line 
> printers) since I can then run RSCS without license fees for 
> IBM. If RSCS were to control all printing, even channel 
> attached printers, will I ever be able to save that sizable 
> chunk of cash?

Well, obviously I don't speak for IBM, but I'd think there's a case to
be made that the "new" line driver to control/manage channel-attached
printers should be part of the no-charge RSCS license, especially if all
it's doing is issuing the appropriate (and already existing) CP commands
to start and stop channel-attached devices. There's minimal new function
or code to be added, and the existing IP-printers-only RSCS license is
already using all the features that would be necessary here.

I suppose it would be possible to add this as a user-written mod, but
I'd really like IBM to do this -- IMHO, it would clean up a loose end
that's been sitting for quite a while, and with the announcement of IBM
Director for CMS, I'd think this would be fewer things to implement
there (and document). 

That's one reason why I'm suggesting using RSCS in this way -- it's a
fairly minor bit of coding to gain a fairly major (IMHO) usability
improvement for newbies. Any other way to go about this would be a lot
more work. 

-- db

Reply via email to