On Jan 4, 2006, at 3:08 PM, Mike Walter wrote:
Miguel,
Steve cited the Summary which states: "- Your first-level system
must be running z/VM 5.1.0 or higher."
I specifically searched the full Guide for "5.1". The step you
refer to states: "o For a second-level installation your first-
level system must be running z/VM Version 5".
Note the discrepancy, the Summary lists "5.1" while the Guide is
more general (and upward compatible) with only "5". Doc error.
If I had time and enough interest, I'd submit an RFC for the
Summary to match the "5" in the Guide. Then when 5.3 hits the
streets there would be one less point of confusion for upgrading
customers. Thanks for pointing out the vagaries of character
searches. (Damned computers! Do what I want not what I ask!) :-)
Aren't "z/VM Version 5" and "z/VM 5.1.0 or higher" strict synonyms
anyway?
Adam
