Not searchable synonyms, they aren't. Mike Walter Hewitt Associates The opinions expressed herein are mine alone, not my employer's.
Isn't it wonderful that IBM doc is so good that we can discuss this sort of trivia? "VM/ESA and z/VM Discussions" <[email protected]> wrote on 01/04/2006 03:44:01 PM: > On Jan 4, 2006, at 3:08 PM, Mike Walter wrote: > > > > > Miguel, > > > > Steve cited the Summary which states: "- Your first-level system > > must be running z/VM 5.1.0 or higher." > > > > I specifically searched the full Guide for "5.1". The step you > > refer to states: "o For a second-level installation your first- > > level system must be running z/VM Version 5". > > > > Note the discrepancy, the Summary lists "5.1" while the Guide is > > more general (and upward compatible) with only "5". Doc error. > > > > If I had time and enough interest, I'd submit an RFC for the > > Summary to match the "5" in the Guide. Then when 5.3 hits the > > streets there would be one less point of confusion for upgrading > > customers. Thanks for pointing out the vagaries of character > > searches. (Damned computers! Do what I want not what I ask!) :-) > > Aren't "z/VM Version 5" and "z/VM 5.1.0 or higher" strict synonyms > anyway? > > Adam > The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents may contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message, including any attachments. Any dissemination, distribution or other use of the contents of this message by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited.
