But if NETSTAT is doing a HNDEXT SET without specifying subcode as you said in a previous post, then it would also be getting the IUCV interrupts (and tossing them as they aren't vmcf).
Mike Harding EDS VM National Capability 134 El Portal Place Clayton, Ca. USA 94517-1742 * phone: +01-925-672-4403 * Fax: +01-925-672-4403 * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (personal) Note: For 2006, I am off on Mondays with even Julian dates and Fridays with odd ones. -----Original Message----- From: VM/ESA and z/VM Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Altmark Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 9:49 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Problem with WAKEUP On Wednesday, 02/15/2006 at 09:41 PST, "Schuh, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I suspect that both are working as designed. You running 2 programs > that are > trying to use a single-user interface. This is a conflict that > probably cannot > be fixed without a major overhaul of the interface and programs that > use it. > > The loss of the message is undoubtedly due to NETSTAT discarding it as an > unknown message/command. Not true. CMS should not be handing IUCV messages (trapped with HNDIUCV SET in WAKEUP) to NETSTAT. Now, if two programs try to use *VMCF* at the same time, unpredictable results will definitely occur since there is no "HNDVMCF" in CMS to provide the needed sharing. Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott
