At 05:59 PM 2/18/00 +0100, jesper.naur wrote:
>Replies to Peter and Dan.
>
>From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Peter Prymmer)
> >> Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.
> >>
> >How about a VMS specific post amble to the relevant Makefile.PL?
>
>Sounds interesting, but needs perhaps some elaboration: Are you thinking
>of using the post-amble to specify a dependency, which would force TK.OLB
>to be built before the linking of EVENT.EXE, or have you something else in
>mind? Also, what mechanisms can be used for adding the TK.OLB reference to
>the contents of EVENT.OPT (note, that I'm already using LIBS to add the
>required reference to SYS$SHARE:DECW$XLIBSHR, but as far as I have been
>able to determine, LIBS only works for libraries, which exist at "perl
>makefile.pl" time, eg. not for libraries, which are themselves built by
>the ongoing build).
Just about everything that gets spat into a makefile can be messed with by
code in Makefile.PL. It's not always *easy*, mind, but it is possible.
>From: Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Are they maybe case issues? That happens sometimes. Also, are they perhaps
> > identical routines just in multiple modules?
>
>No, they are not case issues, each of the duplicates have identical
>spelling, also in terms of case.
>
>Further, some of them are identical, but alas - some of them aren't!
Well, bummer. That's really odd, and I wonder if it might be some latent
bug or code sync issue. Tk's certainly big enough for something like that
to happen.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
