At 08:35 AM 3/6/00 -0600, Craig A. Berry wrote:
>At 12:05 PM 3/5/00 -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> >At 04:46 PM 3/3/00 -0600, Craig A. Berry wrote:
> >>%SYSTEM-F-ACCVIO, access violation, reason mask=00, virtual
> address=000000000000000C, PC=00000000000A9938, PS=0000001B
> >>%TRACE-F-TRACEBACK, symbolic stack dump follows
> >
> >Gah. I don't know what's scarier, the thought that print is dying or the
> thought that I know what perl's doing just from looking at the traceback
> info. I'll bet there's some bogus filehandle thing going on, but beats me what.
>
>I remember a case where with my old compiler (5.2) we had to check for a
>null pointer before flushing. Also the fileno macro is definitely broken
>in this version of DEC C, so I'll look for things like that.
I remember that one. If you can check it out that'd be great. (We still
haven't hit RC1, but it's looming large, that's for sure)
>Sorry to be AWOL the last couple of days, but our RAS was down the entire
>weekend )-:.
You say that like no RAS is a *bad* thing. :) What, no xDSL or cable modem? :-p
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
