At 11:49 AM -0800 3/15/01, Peter Prymmer wrote:
>So does it look worthwhile to add a special @ivp_tests_to_skip array to
>test.com?
Perhaps, but the list seems rather too long to justify that
currently. I wonder if there is any pattern to the remaining
failures. In particular, I believe 'FAILED at test 0' is often the
result of failing to find a library. I think I'd rather copy over
[.lib...] and delete it afterwards than skip that many tests. Thanks
for working on this.
--
____________________________________________
Craig A. Berry
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]