novell netware 3.12 didn't have graphics on the console as far as I know. if it did, we never enabled them.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gobbledegeek Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 02:51 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: VNC-List digest, Vol 1 #1273 - 28 msgs Hmm you never ran graphics apps then I suppose. The situation changes drastically with a graphics app I think. Good to know though... Rgrds > From: "Erik Soderquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > > I would like to know a little more about the vnc install options... > > also, I know I've used headless systems before that didn't have video > cards (486/original pentium timeframe). the install had to be done with > the video card (obviously, but after that, reboot into bios, and tell > the bios that it is a video-less system, save and power down, remove > video and power up and it never complained. freed up another 1/2 meg of > ram that was no longer mapped to video. this was a novell 3.12 server. > for those that don't know, novell 3.12 loaded DOS first with minimal > drivers, basically the memory manager (himem.sys), then loaded novell > netware, rather like windows 3.1 did. we added several diagnostic > routines to the autoexec before netware started, all dumping to text > files. one was a memory listing. showed 720k conventional memory... most > everyone I showed that to accused me of falsifying it. _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list [email protected] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list [email protected] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
