On Friday 02 December 2005 09:21 pm, James Weatherall wrote: > Hal, > > The standard VNC server uses the ZRLE compression scheme over slow > links, which is higher performance in virtually all cases than the Tight > encoding. > > What specifically is the "slow" behaviour that you are seeing?
It *seemed* like with Real, that I was beginning to see delays when I double clicked on icons before the screen showed the full window, fully updated, but I'm not sure. It could also be slower connections, or just my imagination. I'm asking because I was looking for compression settings and some info and didn't find ay. As I said, I was wondering if it was my imagination. I'm more than willing to accept that it was. I'm sure you know what I mean -- you change something, just a small thing, and your mind plays tricks on you, when you think that something's changed. Thanks for the assurance! ;-) Hal > Regards, > > Wez @ RealVNC Ltd. > > Hal Vaughan wrote: > > I have worked with a few people who had TightVNC servers on their system, > > using either the TightVNC or RealVNC viewer on my system. Recently I've > > worked with some people using the RealVNC server (the latest version). > > > > Is it my imagination, or is the RealVNC server slower? Does it use > > compression to speed up transmission, like TightVNC? > > > > Just wondering if it's my imagination or not. > > > > Hal > > _______________________________________________ > > VNC-List mailing list > > [email protected] > > To remove yourself from the list visit: > > http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list > > _______________________________________________ > VNC-List mailing list > [email protected] > To remove yourself from the list visit: > http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list [email protected] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
