You are right Adam. But how would I integrate this architecture with Real VNC's XFree86 because the some patches given at http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/vnc/ works only for X.org architecture.
Thanks, Paresh On 8/8/08, Adam Tkac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 02:53:57PM +0530, paresh masani wrote: > > Hi Friends, > > Hi, > > > I came across these architectures while applying the different patches > like > > XRANDR,XRENDER, vnc-fb-use to the Real VNC from fedora site > > http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/vnc/ and I found that some of > > these patches only works for X.org. Sorry but I dont have any clue what > is > > this architecture. Could any one please let me know how it different from > > Real VNC's XFree86 architecture. > > > > You can find quick history of X.Org server on > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X.Org_Server. It was forked from XFree > 4.4 series and now is much more better than original XFree. Vast > majority of OS vendors uses X.Org as default X protocol implementation. > > Base architecture was similar in early X releases (7.0, ...) but > current X has many differencies from original XFree. > > From my point of view RealVNC doesn't care about free vnc edition > so this is main point why it still uses old XFree. I can't see any > advantage of this approach. > > Adam > > -- > Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc. > _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list [email protected] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
