Adam, Could you please help me here? Thanks a lot in advanced, Paresh
On 8/22/08, paresh masani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You are right Adam. But how would I integrate this architecture with Real > VNC's XFree86 because the some patches given at > http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/vnc/ works only for X.org > architecture. > > Thanks, > Paresh > > > > On 8/8/08, Adam Tkac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 02:53:57PM +0530, paresh masani wrote: >> > Hi Friends, >> >> Hi, >> >> > I came across these architectures while applying the different patches >> like >> > XRANDR,XRENDER, vnc-fb-use to the Real VNC from fedora site >> > http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/vnc/ and I found that some >> of >> > these patches only works for X.org. Sorry but I dont have any clue what >> is >> > this architecture. Could any one please let me know how it different >> from >> > Real VNC's XFree86 architecture. >> > >> >> You can find quick history of X.Org server on >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X.Org_Server. It was forked from XFree >> 4.4 series and now is much more better than original XFree. Vast >> majority of OS vendors uses X.Org as default X protocol implementation. >> >> Base architecture was similar in early X releases (7.0, ...) but >> current X has many differencies from original XFree. >> >> From my point of view RealVNC doesn't care about free vnc edition >> so this is main point why it still uses old XFree. I can't see any >> advantage of this approach. >> >> Adam >> >> -- >> Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc. >> > > _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list [email protected] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
