Hi, I think you have misunderstood me. I want to you X.Org only but how would i use it that what I have been asking you. Currently to comple the Xvnc code I have to get the Real VNC complete code then I have to get the source of XFree86/xc and overlay on top of the VNC provided xc directory. Now if I want to use X.Org then definatetly i should not use source of XFree86/xc. Could you tell me now how can I use X.Org. Is there any code is there? I have read about http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/vnc/ where a number of fixes plus support for 24-bit color, XRandR, various bug fixes haves been givem. It has abandoned the monolithic XFree86 tree, and instead use the new Xorg module based approach based on autotools. This would dramatically reduce the burden of building/maintaining portions of X.
Thanks, Paresh On 9/8/08, Adam Tkac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 04:19:04PM +0530, paresh masani wrote: > > Hi, > > it is not so easy to use that patches to pure RealVNC source (and > XFree86) because X.Org and XFree86 are different in some places. I'm > affraid you have to understand XFree internals and rewrite patches > whose are not usable (or some of them are not needed). > > Btw could I ask you why you don't want use X.Org? > > Regards, Adam > > > Adam, Could you please help me here? > > > > Thanks a lot in advanced, > > Paresh > > > > > > On 8/22/08, paresh masani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > You are right Adam. But how would I integrate this architecture with > Real > > > VNC's XFree86 because the some patches given at > > > http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/vnc/ works only for X.org > > > architecture. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Paresh > > > > > > > > > > > > On 8/8/08, Adam Tkac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > > >> On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 02:53:57PM +0530, paresh masani wrote: > > >> > Hi Friends, > > >> > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> > I came across these architectures while applying the different > patches > > >> like > > >> > XRANDR,XRENDER, vnc-fb-use to the Real VNC from fedora site > > >> > http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/vnc/ and I found that > some > > >> of > > >> > these patches only works for X.org. Sorry but I dont have any clue > what > > >> is > > >> > this architecture. Could any one please let me know how it different > > >> from > > >> > Real VNC's XFree86 architecture. > > >> > > > >> > > >> You can find quick history of X.Org server on > > >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X.Org_Server. It was forked from XFree > > >> 4.4 series and now is much more better than original XFree. Vast > > >> majority of OS vendors uses X.Org as default X protocol > implementation. > > >> > > >> Base architecture was similar in early X releases (7.0, ...) but > > >> current X has many differencies from original XFree. > > >> > > >> From my point of view RealVNC doesn't care about free vnc edition > > >> so this is main point why it still uses old XFree. I can't see any > > >> advantage of this approach. > > >> > > >> Adam > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc. > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc. > _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list [email protected] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
