Also, does anyone have a connection with Paetec, that they can try a test call to 217-777-0001? I’ve got a customer with a toll free number with Petec that won’t complete and they won’t help me. Arrggg.
Thanks, Adam From: VoiceOps [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adam Vocks Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 8:18 AM To: Jared Geiger Cc: VoiceOps Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777 Jared, wondering if Hypercube ever got back with you? I’ve here a couple people tell me now that Hypercube has the lowest rate for 217/777 so I’m wondering if most LCR engines choose that carrier. Adam From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jared Geiger Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 1:20 PM To: Adam Vocks Cc: VoiceOps Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777 I have a trouble ticket open with Hypercube. Their rate is super low for this NPA/NXX and is the route has long PDD then fails. So I'm wondering if once this route is fixed, if most everyone else's routes will get fixed. I guess Level3 fixing it will help as well. On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Adam Vocks <[email protected]> wrote: I'm really hoping Level3 is having a routing issue with our code. Some tried a call on level3 to us which failed. Odd things is that Level3 is directly connected to the Tandem we subtend. I wouldn't think Level3 would send it off their network??? Adam -----Original Message----- From: VoiceOps [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul Timmins Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 12:30 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777 What's worse really is not that you have to look at ILEC tandems out of area - they don't perform any route filtering, if the originating caller is calling out of area, it gets sent to their PIC/LPIC LD carrier. So what you really need is every IXC in the country to make sure they have a route to you either directly, through whatever tandem homing arrangements you have, or via another IXC (really common especially in rural areas to see a Level 3/Global Crossing hand off to Qwest/AT&T/Verizon for the final termination.). -Paul On 07/15/2014 10:52 AM, Adam Vocks wrote: > So, at the very least, I need to start looking at each of the ILEC's > tandems in a specific LATA? > > Adam > > -----Original Message----- > From: VoiceOps [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Alex Balashov > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 9:48 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777 > > On 07/15/2014 10:44 AM, Adam Vocks wrote: > >> :-) >> >> Take Kidd's call from Verizon in Colorado. If there isn't our >> exchange in their local switch, do they forward the call on to >> another switch in hopes that it will know where to send it? Similar >> to a default gateway in IP world? > It would get kicked up to an ILEC tandem inside that LATA. There is > really no default gateway beyond that; at that point, you've already > exited into what the IP world would call "default route-free" or "Tier > 1" routing space. > > -- > Alex Balashov - Principal > Evariste Systems LLC > Tel: +1-678-954-0670 <tel:%2B1-678-954-0670> > Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/ > > Please be kind to the English language: > > http://www.entrepreneur.com/article/232906 > _______________________________________________ > VoiceOps mailing list > [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops > > _______________________________________________ > VoiceOps mailing list > [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
