On 08/25/2015 05:52 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
On 08/25/2015 04:41 PM, Paul Timmins wrote:

most landline carriers won't port it to a landline if it's out of
ratecenter.

I thought ports were only possible within a rate centre, and so by definition impossible to port to a carrier which doesn't operate in that rate centre?


That's what the rules say, yes. The language seems clear but these days really isn't.

The technology itself lets you basically port anything in the LATA you're in as long as your LRN is well connected. "operating in the ratecenter" can get pretty nebulous when you're talking about things like hosted PBX, remote call forwards, VoIP ATAs, remote office things like google voice, etc.

Nothing technically stops me from providing you a POTS line here in Detroit with a Los Angeles phone number, in and out. I could load a detroit 911 address and even not have to worry that you'll die if something untoward happens here. And it could all be as baseband voice on that twin copper wire coming into your house (and I could put bonded VDSL2/ADSL2+ on that if you wanted, too, depending on the wirecenter and distance!). For me, it's just keystrokes at my desk. And depending on what and how you and I contract, there's nothing at all illegal or even unethical about it. Heck, foreign exchange lines are a tariffed product still in many states!

What i cannot do for sure is have you request service from me, give you a number 3 towns over and not have you aware of that, and then laugh as you try to take that to AT&T POTS and watch them tell you in a bewildered tone that you can't keep that number and how do you have that anyway.

(This language applies mostly to Michigan as we've mostly deregulated our entire telecom industry here, to the consumer's detriment)

-Paul
_______________________________________________
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

Reply via email to