Depends on whether you want to provide a quality product or not. G.729 already
hovers just above the line of "satisfied". The slightest impairment drives
that below what is considered acceptable. I wouldn't deploy it.
From: Robert Johnson <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 5:43 PM
Subject: [VoiceOps] G.729 A/B Experiences
Hey everyone,
I'm looking to deploy a lower-bandwidth codec, and am wondering what
everyone's experience has been with G.729, primary regarding voice
quality. Historically, we have limited our codec use to G.711.
Some test calls in the lab are showing promising results, I'm just
curious what might happen in the real-world.
Thank you for your time!!
--
Robert Johnson
BendTel, Inc.
(541)389-4020
Central Oregon's Own Telephone and Internet Service Provider
www.bendtel.com/about/
_______________________________________________
VoiceOps mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
Sent from Yahoo Mail From: Robert Johnson <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 5:43 PM
Subject: [VoiceOps] G.729 A/B Experiences
Hey everyone,
I'm looking to deploy a lower-bandwidth codec, and am wondering what
everyone's experience has been with G.729, primary regarding voice
quality. Historically, we have limited our codec use to G.711.
Some test calls in the lab are showing promising results, I'm just
curious what might happen in the real-world.
Thank you for your time!!
--
Robert Johnson
BendTel, Inc.
(541)389-4020
Central Oregon's Own Telephone and Internet Service Provider
www.bendtel.com/about/
_______________________________________________
VoiceOps mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
_______________________________________________
VoiceOps mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
