Sure would be nice if a big carrier like bandwidth.com would natively support the OPUS codec! I think its going to take a big carrier like bandwidth.com or Level3 pushing the SBC/switch vendors to push OPUS. It would be the end all be all codec for voice.
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 8:01 AM, James Milko <[email protected]> wrote: > Biased as all get out, but if your carrier doesn't support at least 729 > and 711 find a new carrier. > > JM > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:02 PM, Calvin Ellison <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> ​Could you put their voice on wires (POTS/PRI/VoIP), and the rest of >> their data on fixed wireless? >> This doesn't necessarily give you any more calls per Kbps, but at least >> keeps voice and data independent. Wires for dependability, radio waves for >> bandwidth at the cost of some latency & packet loss. >> >> One consideration when using G.729 is how you're going to deliver it to a >> mostly non-G.729 world. Are your not-quite-broadband customers attached to >> some PBX that will handle it and send G.711 to your carriers? That's going >> to cost some CPU or dedicated transcoding hardware. Will your providers >> accept G.729 and transcode for you? Is there a cost for it? Or will your >> carriers blindly throw your G.729 at their LCR and hope something sticks? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> VoiceOps mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > VoiceOps mailing list > [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops > >
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
