On 03/11/2016 07:02 PM, Calvin Ellison wrote: > ​Could you put their voice on wires (POTS/PRI/VoIP), and the rest of > their data on fixed wireless? > This doesn't necessarily give you any more calls per Kbps, but at least > keeps voice and data independent. Wires for dependability, radio waves > for bandwidth at the cost of some latency & packet loss.
There are a number of situations in which we do just this, but in doing so, and depending on the customers location, can price us out of the market. Such as a customer looking for >23 channels. > > One consideration when using G.729 is how you're going to deliver it to > a mostly non-G.729 world. Are your not-quite-broadband customers > attached to some PBX that will handle it and send G.711 to your > carriers? That's going to cost some CPU or dedicated transcoding > hardware. Will your providers accept G.729 and transcode for you? Is > there a cost for it? Or will your carriers blindly throw your G.729 at > their LCR and hope something sticks? We don't currently connect to any carrier via VoIP, all of the equipment to transcode G.711/G.729 -> T1 Trunking is already in place. Even in the event where we do connect to a carrier via VoIP, we'll transcode to G.711 (or other) before passing the call off. > > > _______________________________________________ > VoiceOps mailing list > [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops > -- Robert Johnson BendTel, Inc. (541)389-4020 Central Oregon's Own Telephone and Internet Service Provider www.bendtel.com/about/ _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
