> my point was that they, of all > things, are a poor standard
> bearer for the NFV marketing- > gasm. With centralized licensing and the ability to scale resources when and where you need them, I would argue they are the perfect device for the NFV marketing-gasm (LOL). On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Alex Balashov <[email protected]> wrote: > On 04/06/2016 10:54 PM, Ryan Delgrosso wrote: > > an SBC ... is a demarcation and control point between network >> segments where you can inject interworking and business logic. >> > > Absolutely, at >= Layer 5. > > If it's news to anyone here that you can virtualise applications, they've > got some catching up to do. > > Anyway, my argument wasn't that SBCs serve no valid purposes. You've done > a good job of outlining them. Instead, my point was that they, of all > things, are a poor standard bearer for the NFV marketing-gasm. > > -- Alex > > -- > Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC > 1447 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 700 > Atlanta, GA 30309 > United States > > Tel: +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) / +1-678-954-0671 (direct) > Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/ > _______________________________________________ > VoiceOps mailing list > [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops >
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
