No. That's not NFV. That's just... V.

--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
1447 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 700
Atlanta, GA 30309
United States

Tel: +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) / +1-678-954-0671 (direct)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/

Sent from my BlackBerry.
From: Pete Eisengrein
Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2016 07:26
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Virtualized SBC

> my point was that they, of all

> things, are a poor standard

> bearer for the NFV marketing-

> gasm.

 

With centralized licensing and the ability to scale resources when and where you need them, I would argue they are the perfect device for the NFV marketing-gasm (LOL).


On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Alex Balashov <[email protected]> wrote:
On 04/06/2016 10:54 PM, Ryan Delgrosso wrote:

an SBC ... is a demarcation and control point between network
segments where you can inject interworking and business logic.

Absolutely, at >= Layer 5.

If it's news to anyone here that you can virtualise applications, they've got some catching up to do.

Anyway, my argument wasn't that SBCs serve no valid purposes. You've done a good job of outlining them. Instead, my point was that they, of all things, are a poor standard bearer for the NFV marketing-gasm.

-- Alex


--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
1447 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 700
Atlanta, GA 30309
United States

Tel: +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) / +1-678-954-0671 (direct)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
_______________________________________________
VoiceOps mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops


_______________________________________________
VoiceOps mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

Reply via email to