Posted by Randy Barnett:
ACS blog on Medical Cannabis case:   

   Yesterday, the government filed its brief in [1]Ashcroft v. Raich, the
   medical cannabis case I have been litigating, which is now before the
   Supreme Court. It contained no surprises but it continues to be
   disappointing to witness a Republican administration so completely
   uninterested in federalism (just as it was disappointing when the
   Clinton Justice Department brought suit in equity to shut down the
   Oakland Cannabis Buyers Cooperative, another pro bono client of mine).
   I realize that disappointment is only an appropriate response if one
   expects something better or different, and I do know better.
   Federalism diminishes the power of whichever party controls the
   Congress or Presidency or both. (And elected Democrats apparently do
   not think they can afford to look soft on drugs.) But it is still
   sad--and yes even a bit disappointing--that neither of the two major
   national parties has any genuine convictions in support of a principal
   so central to our constitutional system.
   Along these same lines, today the American Constitution Society has
   [2]this post up about Ashcroft v. Raich on its blog:

     In the wake of Morrison, Senator Joseph Biden compared the new
     federalism to the pre-New Deal Lochner era:

     "In both eras, the Court adopted these formalistic distinctions in
     interpreting the Commerce Clause in service of broader political
     theories shared by a majority of the Court's members. In the
     pre-New Deal era, that broader political theory was laissez faire
     economics; now it is the new federalism. In both instances, the
     Court has been eager to substitute its own judgment for that of the
     political branches democratically elected by the people to do their
     business."

     Raich has given the Rehnquist majority an opportunity to prove
     Senator Biden wrong. By affirming the Ninth Circuit's decision, the
     Court will demonstrate an ability to uniformly interpret the
     Constitution, even when they dislike the outcome.

   And so we shall argue.

References

   1. http://www.raich-v-ashcroft.com/
   2. 
http://www.acsblog.org/federalism-91-when-conservative-doctrines-collide-medical-marijuana-meets-federalism.html

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://highsorcery.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to