Posted by Eugene Volokh:
Be Careful What You Wish For:

   One thing I noticed recently is the increasing sentiment among some
   American Jews in favor of "hate speech" restrictions, especially given
   the recent incidents of anti-Semitism at some universities. I just ran
   into that a couple of days ago on a Jewish academics' discussion list
   on which I'm a passive reader. The [1]Australian decision that found
   harsh criticism of Islam illegal should, I think, be a reminder that
   hate speech bans can bite anyone.

   Many people think such laws will ban criticism (which they think is
   hateful, and much of which may indeed be hateful) of their group. But
   they quickly discover that the laws easily spread, and soon spread to
   criticisms that you yourself may want to make -- though of course
   you'll make such criticisms much more fairly and temperately, and
   naturally you're completely sure that a hostile judiciary will
   recognize this and find your speech to be different, right?

   Justice Douglas put it well when dissenting from Beauharnais v.
   Illinois, a 1952 case that upheld a law that banned libels of races
   and religions (and that is fortunately widely believed to have been
   implicitly overruled):

     Today a white man stands convicted for protesting in unseemly
     language against our decisions invalidating restrictive covenants.
     Tomorrow a negro will be hailed before a court for denouncing lynch
     law in heated terms. Farm laborers in the west who compete with
     field hands drifting up from Mexico; whites who feel the pressure
     of orientals; a minority which finds employment going to members of
     the dominant religious group -- all of these are caught in the mesh
     of today�s decision.

   Today you may want Aryan racists or Muslim radicals to be convicted
   for condemning Jews. Tomorrow a Christian will be hailed before a
   court for denouncing Islam in heated terms. The next day someone with
   perfectly fair and sensible criticisms of Islam will be convicted
   because his views seem too radical or not sufficiently balanced for
   the judicial elites of the time.

References

   1. http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2005_02_27-2005_03_05.shtml#1109774462

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://highsorcery.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to