Posted by Randy Barnett:
The Symbiosis Between the MSN and Bloggers:  

   A really nice column on the how the MSM needs bloggers and vice versa
   by Phil Boas, the deputy editorial page editor for The Arizona
   Republic: [1]Bloggers: The light at the end of the newspaper's tunnel.
   Here is how it begins:

     Engaged bloggers are voracious newspaper readers, too.
     It's customary for anyone writing to the uninitiated about blogs to
     define them. This is a journalism trade publication and you are no
     ordinary reader, so I'll spare you the customary definition.
     Instead, I'll define blogs as they relate to you.
     They are your Nemesis in the making.
     If you've remained nonplussed as they took down Dan Rather and four
     of his Black Rock colleagues, if you haven't the slightest interest
     in acquainting yourself with the blogosphere, don't move an inch.
     You won't have to. Bloggers will be knocking on your door any day
     now. Or knocking it down.
     To many of you, bloggers are a presumptuous rabble--amateurs
     elbowing their way into the publishing world. You may not know
     them, but they know youyour face, your manners, your prejudices,
     your conceits.
     They're your readers. And, God help us, they've become the one
     thing we've always begged them to become . . .
     Engaged.

   Here is how it ends:

     If you listen closely, tuning in to the conversation beyond the
     oft-expressed contempt for mainstream media, you'll find the
     blogosphere actually needs mainstream media. We provide most of the
     coverage that starts the conversation. And by carrying the
     conversation further than we do, the blogosphere makes mass media
     vital.
     The bloggers are demanding better standards and less bias--not
     unreasonable demands given journalism's current track record. But
     they're also creating stimulating and often irresistible discussion
     around the news we produce.
     Journalism tomorrow, thanks to forces like the blogosphere, will
     grow more competitive. The best journalists will flourish. The
     mediocre will be exposed and washed out.

   Everything in the middle is worth reading too, such as this:

     We are headed to the Web in a big way, and our readers--especially
     our most engaged readers, the bloggers--are going with us. They are
     giving us a taste now of what our new environment will be like.
     They will challenge and cajole us to confront our biases and our
     mistakes. And if we don't confront them, they'll clean our clocks.
     They'll be our competitors and our colleagues and they'll force us
     to dig deeper into issues, think harder about them. They'll show us
     how to coalesce expertise on a breaking story and drill deeper for
     the more complete truth.

   Whenever I blog about blogging, I often get an email insisting that
   bloggers need the MSM and are no replacement for it. I agree with this
   and this column, written to legacy journalists by a journalist,
   describes the symbiotic relationship between the MSM and blogging as
   succinctly as I have seen. (Hat tip [2]Little Green Footballs and a
   commentator on [3]Roger L. Simon who led me to LGF)

References

   1. http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3771/is_200504/ai_n13498906
   2. 
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=15549_Bloggers-_The_Light_at_the_End_of_the_Media_Tunnel#comments
   3. http://www.rogerlsimon.com/mt-archives/2005/04/pinocchios_of_t.php#c46058

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://highsorcery.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to