Based on teardown photos on EEVblog, 8588A does not use LTFLU but LTZ1000 
instead.

Old batch 8508As also used LTZ1000 (exact module from 1281/1271) before 
switching over to LTFLU. 

On October 26, 2019 4:09:09 PM EDT, Frank Stellmach 
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Hi Philipp,
>
>you definitely have to clean the fan filter of your unit.. standing
>free 
>on a table, and with a clean filter, the internal temperature rise is 
>12..13°C at most.
>
>Defining a metrology grade 3458A would explicitly require to define and
>
>control the environmental conditions in the specification, like
>reduced  
>temperature range, specifying the ventilation requirements, like no use
>
>in a rack, by using a different filter, and also by regularly checking 
>the internal temperature by firmware.
>
>The 3458A is designed and specified as a system DMM, inside a rack, in
>a 
>hot manufacturing environment, like in a electronics manufacturing
>line, 
>but never was intended and built as a metrology DMM, as hp and KS still
>
>try to advertise.
>
>Your argument, that a sample distribution is root cause of these wide 
>specification limits, does not convince me:
>
>The annual and temperature drift (with ACAL) is mainly determined by
>the 
>drift of the two internal references, due to the ACAL technique, the 
>rest of the circuit does contribute only marginally, but on the w/o
>ACAL 
>specifications .
>
>Therefore, the 8508/88A simply beat the 3458A, because they use an
>LTFLU 
>running at 45..55°C only, instead of 95°C, and due to the heavy usage
>of 
>stable Vishay BMF resistors, which also contribute to the superior 
>short- and midterm stability of these instruments.
>
>So only the sample distribution and yield of the LTZ and 40k resistor 
>affect the annual drift specification limits for the 3458A.
>
>Concerning the LTZ reference, that is already covered by their 
>monitoring / selection process, where they have for sure have yield 
>problems already.
>
>If they would simply reduce the temperature for metrology purposes,
>like 
>in practice done on the FLUKE DMMs, they would directly get near 100% 
>yield for 2..3ppm/year (@65°C),  due to the ACAL DCV feature..
>
>The 8508/88 on the other hand have to account for the drift of other 
>components, to achieve e.g. these 4ppm/year, although the LTFLU very 
>probably performs more like 1..2ppm/year (inside the 732B, @ 47°C, for 
>example).
>
>I think the 3458A would at least be on par with the FLUKE DMMs if KS 
>would simply chose the same metrology grade resistors and oven 
>temperature as DATRON/FLUKE had done...
>
>Frank
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>volt-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
>To unsubscribe, go to
>http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts_lists.febo.com
>and follow the instructions there.

BR,
Illya Tsemenko
_______________________________________________
volt-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to