a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote:

Jed
>
> "So, I am not speculating. I may be wrong but I am not speculating."
>
> No comment needed.
>

A comment is needed. What the hell do you mean? I am clearly not
speculating here when I cite what people told me, what the lawsuit said,
and what a photo shows.

Let's look at the definition of speculate:

"form a theory or conjecture about a subject without firm evidence."

As you see, I am not forming a theory or conjecture; I am telling you
facts. At least, they are facts as far as I know.

I do have firm evidence. A photo showing Rossi standing in a machine
similar to the one shown in the drawing is good evidence that his machine
has multiple units.

You can't just make up a new definition of "speculate" and pin it on me.
Language does not work that way.

- Jed

Reply via email to